watervole: (Default)

 We are now at a stage where the effects of climate change are starting to be really noticeable. In the UK: we have regular summer droughts, winter storms and floods causing serious damage, plus excess heat in summer reduces people's ability to work (and increases the death rate, especially among the elderly).  

The damage to our food supplies, our natural world, our health is massive and continues to increase. In short, things are bad, and are going to get worse - how much worse depends very much on what we do here and now.

Apart from voting for the political party most willing to tackle the issue of climate change, the only things we can do are to reduce our own carbon emissions.

Society as  whole needs to halve it's carbon footprint by 2030...

 

We all need to look at what we can do personally.  There are many things we can do, and hopefully, you'll try something for yourself as a New Year Resolution.

 

The plus side of doing this is that people we know are more likely to go green if we do.  For instance, two people I know have installed heat pumps after seeing how well our system was working. (one of my friends regularly comments on how warm the house is, and how even the warmth is - because heat pumps deliver a lower temperature heat, you don't fry next to the radiator and freeze on the far side of the room - the warm air circulates more)

What can you do that makes a difference?

There is a real lack of awareness of what is helpful and what is not:

I was recently talking to an acquaintance in Swanage.  We were drinking tea and she offered oat milk (which I accepted, as I use it at home). I asked, out of curiosity if she ever use soy milk.

Oh, no!  She'd been on a cruise down the Amazon and seen all the deforestation caused by soy plantations.

I mentioned gently that most of the soy in the Amazon region is grown for cattle feed, and that eating beef is far, far more environmentally damaging. 

 Ah, she wasn't aware of that, and was far from certain that she actually believed it, and didn't really want to eat less meat anyway.

I decided not to mention that her cruise, and the flights to get there and back (and she goes on  a cruise holiday every year - I could see the photos on her wall) were MASSIVELY damaging to the environment.

A cruise holiday is probably the single most damaging activity that anyone can do in their lives (unless they own a private jet...)

The next most damaging activity is flying - even short distance flights carry a surprisingly high cost, as take off and landing are particularly bad.  I get that some people need to fly on occasion. I have two friends with elderly relatives overseas who genuinely need help from their children. Also, some people will need to travel for work on occasion.  But when someone tells me they are going to the Canaries for Christmas, it's very hard to just politely say nothing.... (I do as  rule, but it's still hard)

After travel, it's heat and meat. Reducing your meat consumption, especially beef and lamb, makes a surprisingly big reduction in CO2 emissions.  Bonus points for vegetarians (though cheese should be eaten in moderation, as that can rack up quite a score over time - if you're cooking cheese, blend in nutritional yeast, which is delicious and very nutritious as well).

Heat - anything you can do to insulate the house better is good.  Also, if your gas boiler is getting near the end of its life, check out current government grants for heat pumps.  They're expensive to install, but grants help with that.  Operating costs are similar to gas at present, but as renewables increase (resulting in cheaper electricity) they should become cheaper to run than gas.  (They were cheaper before the Russian invasion of Ukraine pushed up all energy prices.)

An oddity - if you're in a position to rent out a room, then this reduces your personal carbon footprint, as the costs of heating are spread between more people.  (It's not for everyone, and it's not the reason we chose to rent a room - that was the Ukrainian war - but we're opting to keep our lodger long term, as he's no trouble at all - we have some very interesting conversations now and then - and the income is handy.)

 

Enough of me waffling! 

What are you doing in your own lives? (I know some of you are already doing masses)

What would you like to do, but are currently unable to do?

Do you have useful tips to share?

 

 

 

 

 

 

watervole: (Default)

 During Covid, everything was focused on surviving that, and we lost momentum on tackling climate change.
 

Now, governments are all focused on Ukraine and again climate slips to the back burner.
 

But we now only have seven years in which to halve our carbon emissions - or we face irreversible, catastrophic climate change (as opposed to mere seriously bad climate change) .

We're already past the point of no return on some aspects of the climate - the storm, droughts, floods and famine (the four horsemen of climate change) will be with us for the rest of our lives and our children's lives - and they will get worse even if we half our emissions tomorrow.
 

What we're fighting for now is survival. 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/28/ipcc-issues-bleakest-warning-yet-impacts-climate-breakdown (and if you don't like the Guardian, there's similar articles in other papers and on the BBC news)

 

It's easy to feel helpless in the face of a problem of this magnitude.  There's the temptation to do nothing because we can't see how it will make any difference.

 

And yet it does make a difference. Not least, because what we do, our friends become more likely to do.  And that ripples out.

Our friends are interested in our heat pump and looking into getting their own.

More and more people are reducing beef and lamb consumption (the worst meats for CO2 emissions).  We're flexitarian - which in our case currently means that we never buy beef or lamb, but would happily eat a left over beef sandwich at the end of a party as wasting food is stupid.

We eat vegan for a lot of our meals, but also eat cheese part of the time.    Every month or so, we'll have some pork sausages or some chicken, but there are so many interesting veggie options that we're doing this less and less.  Our veg box from Riverford always has a good variety of food, and they have great recipes on their web site.

I know I'm far from the only one of my friends trying to cut consumption overall. Lots of people I know are cutting back on new clothes, repairing what they have, and buying second-hand.  I've actually lost track of when I last bought a new item of clothing - but it was certainly well before Covid. And yet, I still have plenty to wear - my wardrobe had a lot of stuff in it.  (If you do this challenge, underwear and socks don't count)

I've become really good at resisting 'stuff'.  Okay, apart from new board games!

What challenges can you set yourselves?

The ones that count are:

Travel - the less you travel the better, and if you can cut out flying you gain big points as that's definitely the highest emitter.  

Heat - Insulation is a long term investment, but it makes a big difference emissions-wise.  

           The big problem with heating is that people don't plan far ahead.  If your gas boiler breaks down, then the need is to instantly rush out and replace it.  Think ahead.  If your boiler is getting old, speak to a heat pump installer and find out what options exist - there's more than one type of heat pump and one may suit your needs better than another.  Check what grants exist.  Then, if your boiler does hit problems, you already know what route to follow. (You can probably borrow electric plug in radiators for the installation period - that's what we did)

Meat - Try to cut out, or greatly reduce your consumption of, beef and lamb.

 

Can you halve your carbon emissions over the next few years?

 

Please try. 

The future of the most adorable seven year old on the planet (feel free to substitute your own sprog or grandsprog here) depends on it.  She's too young to vote, and by the time she is, it may already be too late.  Please help her and all those children throughout the world who need us.

 

Remember, whenever a government says combating climate change will be too expensive - what they actually mean is "We're passing the bill to the next generation, only it will cost more for them as they will have to pay for the damage as well as the solution."

watervole: (Save the Earth)

I'm going to cover Banks, Investments, Insurance Companies and Pensions.  All are important, and some are very easy to change. 


Much of the information in this post comes from Ethical Consumer Magazine  https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ They've done some excellent articles on ethical investments, and if you're a subscriber you get full access to the stuff on their website which has all the information from previous issues in a very useful format.  

They're a useful resource for a lot of information and I highly recommend getting a subscription.  

So, where do you start?

You have several areas:

1.  Change your bank.

2.  Change your insurance company (Insurance companies have very large fossil fuel investments)

3.  See if you can change your pension to a greener option. (best to do this BEFORE you retire, as you may not be able to do so afterwards)

4.  Move your savings and investments.


BANKS

The very worst offenders are Barclays, followed by HSBC (First Direct is part of HSBC and M&S Money is 50% HSBC - so avoid those too) CitigroupLloyds Banking Group (LloydsHalifaxBank of Scotland), NatWest Group (NatWestRBSCoutts) and Santander (Santander, Carter Allen) are all financing of fossil fuels - but they're not quite as bad as Barclays and HSBC..

The best bank for ethics by a fair margin is Triodos (not just climate change -other ethical issues too). (you have to pay a small monthly fee for a current account, but you are far less likely to get charged large fees for things like accidental overdrafts, etc)

Other good ones include: 

Cumberland BS current accounts, Monzo app-based bank, Nationwide current accounts, Starling Bank current accounts

We moved our bank account from First Direct (large fossil fuel investments) to Nationwide - no fossil fuel investments. And we wrote to First Direct to tell them why they had lost our business.
 

INSURANCE

There's nothing like being in the business of assessing risks to convert you to seeing the dangers of climate change. 

There are no clear winners in the insurance industry, they all have a way to go (they have big reserve funds which include a lot of money in fossil fuels).  However, action is starting to happen, and there are insurers who refuse to insure coal power stations, etc.  

I would study the Ethical Consumer guide to insurers to make your own choice.

We moved to AXA who are one of the better ones (they're part of the group unfriendly to coal, but still have progress to make elsewhere) - and saved money on our policy as well.


INVESTMENTS and PENSIONS

If you're lucky enough to have savings and investments - and this includes your pension - this is an area where you can achieve several gains all at the same time:

1.  You reduce the risk of your investment losing a lot of its value - especially important if it's your pension.  https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2021/nov/04/fossil-fuel-assets-worthless-2036-net-zero-transition

2.  There's nothing like taking away your money from an institution to send a very pointed message - but when leaving, it's important that you write to them to explain why you're leaving.

3.  Some of the fossil free funds have really good rates of return.  

4.  You get the pleasure of taking a positive step that costs virtually nothing, takes very little effort, and helps keep fossil fuels in the ground.

There's a really good guide in Ethical Consumer, which shows you rates of return as well as ethical ratings.

The clear  winners on fossil fuel free (and overall good ethics) are: 

FP WHEB Sustainability Fund [C] WHEB Asset Management LLP and Triodos Pioneer Impact Fund [C] Triodos Bank UK Limited

 
We moved our savings to Triodos - https://www.triodos.co.uk/impact-investments. No fossil fuels and no firms that support fossil fuels either.  Also very happy with the rate of return!

WHEB have recently made it much easier for small investors, so we may try their fund as well.

PENSIONS

The amount of control you have over your pension investments will vary.  If it's a plan with your employers, then try talking to them about the risks inherent in long-term fossil fuel investments.  Both to the planet and to the security of your income in retirement - if there's still a habitable planet left when you reach that age...

If you're organising your own pension, then firms to look at include: for workplace pensions is Nest (not-for-profit and carbon divestment policies) and for personal pensions Royal London (high scoring mutual).

Firms to avoid - Fidelity, Old Mutual Wealth, Virgin Money, Scottish Widows

But I would strongly recommend reading the Ethical Consumer guide in full. It goes into a lot more detail than I can cover here.

It costs less than a fiver a month to subscribe, and it's more than repaid my two year's membership by finding me a fund that was more ethical (in the areas I'm interested in) than the one recommended by my local Financial Advisor, and with a significantly better rate of return as well.

watervole: (Save the Earth)

 Today COP 26 themed post is about electric transport. the12daysofcop.wordpress.com/drive-electric/

It's a big gain carbon-wise, but this one - unlike  many other climate saving actions which can cost virtually nothing - is an expensive step.

Electric cars are wonderful - we've just bought a second-hand Renault Zoe - and for the first time in my life, I actually enjoy driving.  It's incredibly smooth, quiet and responsive.  (It has a 200 mile range in Eco mode)

It's not a step we'd expected to take for several years.  With nearly everything, the best item carbon-wise is the one you already own.  Cost of manufacture is never trivial.  But, when the garage investigated why our car was behaving in a manner that made it dangerous to drive, they finally (after several weeks trying to trace a transient fault) told us that the cost to repair it was a lot more than the value of the car.

So, we bit the bullet and went electric.

Not everyone is going to be able to afford to do this in the short term.  It will be a while before electric cars trickle down to the bottom of the second-hand market, but it will be increasingly viable as time passes.

Charging networks should also improve - I know people who are concerned that they won't have a charging point where they normally park at home - I suspect the likely solution will be available charging points where people work and shop.  A lot of car parks and supermarkets are already introducing chargers.

BUT - and it's a big but - the best environmental options will still be walking, cycling and public transport. (yes, guilty here - it turned out that getting our granddaughter to school was the killer - there's no bus service from here. She can get the school bus from where her parents live, but not from here, and it's only walkable when the weather in fine and we have an hour for the walk there and back again.)

Electric cars are lower carbon, but not zero carbon.  It's important to remember that.  

With any new energy saving technology comes what is known as the 'rebound effect'.  If it gets cheaper, people do more of it, and thus wipe out much of the carbon-savings.

If you start driving further because your electric car is cheap and green to run, then it isn't as green as you intended.

 

Electric bikes are so efficient that they're actually more carbon-friendly than walking the same distance. (The carbon cost of the food you burn is higher.)

I went out this morning on mine and came back with two charity shop curtains (in the panniers) that will hang in our office.  They have linings, so will keep in more heat than our existing curtains.

 

 

 

Food Waste

Nov. 1st, 2021 04:25 pm
watervole: (Save the Earth)

 Food waste is a surprisingly big hitter on Climate Change.  Whenever we grow unused food, we're wasting all the carbon cost of growing it, and also losing the advantages that could be gained if the land was restored to nature.

  • In the UK 7 million tonnes of food is thrown away by households every year, that’s around a third of all the food we buy. If we stopped wasting food it would have the same impact on carbon emissions as taking 1.8 million cars off UK roads.

But food waste is also hard one to reduce.  There are many different causes of food waste, and each of them requires a different approach.  It requires many small changes in habits and it's easy to forget, or not want to take the extra  time to write out a shopping list - but there's more than one motivator.  Imagine if you could reduce your food bill by a third....

See the12daysofcop.wordpress.com/cut-food-waste/ for additional tips to those given here.

There are things that we can do.  None of them are easy as it tends to take time and effort to change habits, especially when they're things we do regularly.

Use leftovers rather than throwing them away.

- this one is always hard for me to wrap my brain around.  Apparently, there are people who don't eat leftovers for supper/breakfast/lunch the next day.  All I can say is that there weren't any in the family I grew up in, and there aren't any in my family either.  My mother would have been horrified, and so would I.

Make a shopping list so you don't buy things you don't need - my husband does the two-weekly main  shop, and he always goes round the kitchen beforehand checking what we're short of, and makes a list.  Has done so for many years.  It makes financial sense, and saves trying to cram too much into cupboards.  (and yet, the odd thing, is that we're never short when people are out panic-buying.  People don't panic buy tins of haricot beans, and they don't go off either...  Same goes for nuts and other veggie staples.)

  • Get in the habit of freezing milk, bread or leftovers that you won’t use straight away.
  • Milk is surprisingly the most significant contributor to avoidable carbon emissions, followed by bread.
  • We don't do this one.  (Well apart from surplus allotment produce). That's because we don't buy more than we need in the first place, so we don't end up with stuff running close to its use-by date.  And we eat the leftovers....
    (If your find your milk regularly goes off, check your fridge temperature - According to the UK food standards agency, the ideal fridge temperature for food is 8°C and below. Taking into account the temperature drop from the opening and closing of the fridge door, the fridge should be set at a temperature between 1-5°C.)
     

  • I'd also suggest having a small fridge (unless you have a lot of people in the house).  The bigger the fridge, the more likely you are to have stuff tucked away at the back that gets forgotten and goes past its date.

  • Challenge - Can you eat everything you buy for a week?  Two weeks? How long can you go without throwing away any food?

    Challenge 2 - Can you buy the food that would normally be wasted before it ever gets to you?  How about those wonky spuds, undersized pears, etc.?  (We get our fruit and veg from Riverford, and they include these as part of their normal supply. The tiny Conference pears this week are very tasty.)




COP 26

Oct. 31st, 2021 12:07 pm
watervole: (Save the Earth)

We all know the climate is in a perilous state, and how close to the edge of complete ecosystem collapse we are treading.

Governments need to act in a big way, but we can also make changes on an individual level that will help.

So, I'll be posting a series of posts during COP 26 to remind us all of what we can do.


Let's start with a relatively easy challenge for reducing your carbon footprint - clothing.

Clothing and textiles make up about 2% of the footprint of the average UK citizen, but it can be 5 to 10 times higher for people who like fast fashion and buy lots of clothes.
 
I've been doing this challenge for several years now. Baring underwear and shoes, I don't buy any new clothing at all.
 
The interesting aspect is that I often get compliments on items of clothing that I bought decades ago.
Also, it's rather nice to get a compliment on a 'new' skirt, smile and say that it only cost a fiver in a charity shop!

More on the climate impact of clothing and what you can do is here (my sister Gillian has done a lot of work on this)

the12daysofcop.wordpress.com/wear-clothes-to-last/

 
 
Like
 
 
 
Comment
 
 
Share
 
 
watervole: (Weaving)

 I enjoyed weaving these.  All second-hand yarn, but I really love working with the greenish self-patterning yarn. I don't know what it's made of, but it feels a bit like cotton, and the colours really come to life with the right lighting.  (which I never seem to have when taking photos!)

I made three in the end -  because the patterns were pretty and I really liked the way the yarns worked together.

Bugshaw, when picking which one you want, the chain  one us 21cm excluding fringe; the cross/diamond pattern is also 21cm excluding fringe, and the little bookworm (which I know is too short for you, is 13cm excluding fringe.

Fringe can be trimmed to suit, thought I wouldn't cut all of it off.   It can also be twisted or plaited, etc.

All of them have different patterns on the back, which can be seen here - www.ravelry.com/projects/JudithProctor/rug-for-bug

The ones Bugshaw doesn't choose are available to anyone willing to make a donation to either www.clientearth.org/ or www.worldlandtrust.org/

As usual, I'm open to requests for belts, bagstraps, decorative bands for clothing, dog leads, bookmarks, etc.  (Tablet weaving is very strong)

 

All I ask in return is that you support my favourite environmental charities and help make the world a tiny bit safer for when my beloved granddaughter is an adult.  

 

By the time she's old enough to vote, we will either have managed to rein back carbon emissions, or we will have screwed it up so badly that nothing her generation can do will be enough to stop catastrophic changes to the climate.

 

Actually, I'll also take environmental pledges. eg. If you fly regularly, I'll happily take giving up aviation for a trip you would normally take.  If you're a regular meat eater, I'd take a pledge to have a meat free day every week, etc.  

 

 

watervole: (Default)

 I'm in shock after reading this year's insurance renewal quote.

We moved our insurance cover to AXA last year, as they have the least money in fossil fuels and related industries (most insurance companies have MASSIVE fossil fuel investments).

It was also a financial gain as their quote turned out to be cheaper (though I'd have been prepared to pay a little  extra if necessary).

Now I've got the renewal quote...

I'm used to phoning my insurance company every year, to haggle down the 10% rise they automatically slap on in the hope that you won't notice.

But this year's quote from Axa was £2 cheaper than last year.

As I said, I'm in shock.

But very happy to recommend Axa!

 

 

Floods

Nov. 8th, 2019 02:55 pm
watervole: (Default)
 Climate change is becoming depressingly real.  More wildfires in Australia and the US, floods in the UK.

My sister lives near Sheffield. Her village is on high ground, so her home is safe from the floods, but river levels are over a meter above their normal height, breaking the previous record by a large margin.  Many people are not so fortunate as she is. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50343977

We've had a massive amount of rain in the south of England, but not as bad as they've had it in the north.

We finally got access to our new allotments (long saga which I'll fill you in on later), but the soil, even on the higher ground, is totally waterlogged.

We're getting pinned between summer droughts and endless heavy rain in winter.

On the plus side, there does seem to be some movement on the political front - all political parties are now starting to make climate change promises, though how many will survive beyond the election is an interesting question.  This is our first election in which a majority of voters have said that the climate will be  a factor in who they vote for.
watervole: (Default)
Yesterday saw temperature records broken all over Europe.

Scientific certainty on the man-made causes of climate change is now well over 99% .

We are an a very big, heavy ship and it is set on a course that will be very difficult to alter.

All we can say, is that the sooner we start to change that course, the better our chances of not crashing into the hypothetical iceberg.  The later we make changes, the less effective they will be.

Global temperature rises are not being driven by just the CO2 we emit this year, but by that plus ALL THE CO2 WE HAVE EVER EMITTED.

Most people reading this will never see lower temperatures in their lifetimes.  We're fighting for our children and our grandchildren.

Our children, if we're really lucky, will see temperatures stabilise in their lifetime.

Our grandchildren, if, and only if, our generation take action now, may see a reduction in temperature, if someone finds a way to take CO2 out of the atmosphere in large quantities.

Remember that planting trees will only absorb the CO2 emitted by cutting down those trees in the first place.  It will not remove the CO2 from fossil fuels.

So, who's ready for lifestyle changes?

Let's tackle clothing for today:

It's estimated that clothing accounts for 10% of the world's carbon emissions. That's because the production of clothing is very energy intensive and the supply chains are very long, with clothing being shipped all around the globe.

Now add in the environmental cost of washing all those clothes and the plastic fibres released by laundering poly-cotton, nylon, polyester, etc.

Now add in the problem of disposing of all the millions of garments that get thrown away every year - most of it is impossible to recycle and goes straight to landfill.

Can you reduce your own impact?

Why not try and see how long you can go without buying a new (second-hand is allowed) item of clothing?

I'm aiming for a year. The last new item I bought was last August, at Purbeck folk festival.  All I've bought since then is a second-hand pair of trousers, two scarves from a charity shop and a second-hand waistcoat for my sword dance costume.

I have a wardrobe full of clothes.  Apart from the occasional item of underwear, I really have all I need for all round the year for a long time to come.  All I'm expecting to buy in the foreseeable future is a pair of linen trousers - linen being a relatively environmentally friendly fabric and cooler to wear in summer, and I need something to protect my legs from insect bites when I go walking on the heath.


watervole: (Default)
 Last night was the hottest night of the year, but we actually got a good night's sleep.

How?

The following won't work for everyone, because it depends on the type of building you live in, what country you live in, and what times of day you are at home, but hopefully there will be something you can take away.  



There are two basic principles.
Recognising that buildings have a heat capacity and the walls act as a reservoir of heat/cool. 
Air flow reduces the temperature that you feel.

1.  Plan well in advance.   Think about how the sun moves round your house during the day.  

2.  In the morning, as soon as I got up, I checked to see if it was cooler inside or outside.  If it's cooler inside, keep windows closed to retain that thermal mass temperature as long as possible.

When that initial cool had worn off, I opened every window and door on the cooler side, and closed all curtains on the hotter side (I left the windows open a little so that building up behind the curtains would be able to escape through the window).

Once the sun mover round, I reversed the curtains and windows. However, I didn't open the windows (apart from a gap as before) on the new 'cooler' side until the temperature in the house was the same as that outside.  (because it was still cooler inside at that point.)

3.  When the temperatures were close (as measured by the cheerfully unscientific method of sticking an arm out of the window), I changed tactic and set the house up to have a flow of air through it.

4.  Curtains still closed on the hot side to keep out direct sunlight, but windows now opened about half way on this side to allow air to flow through (our curtains aren't fixed at the wall end, so it's easy to slide them open a little at the wall end to let air flow past)

5.  Front and back door now held open with a pair of old flat irons. They're nice and heavy and will hold any door.  Kitchen door, which is directly between front and back door is closed (as it will slam shut if both other doors are open, and besides, I want to direct the air flow through the lounge, where were are sitting)

6.  Lounge doors held open with heavy weights - gentle breeze now going through lounge.  All upstairs curtains and windows following same rules as downstairs. ie. curtains open if outside is cooler, closed if outside is hotter.  All windows on cooler side are open to encourage air flow, and windows on hotter side open a little to avoid heat build up behind windows.

7.  Remember that thick curtains with lining make good insulation - I haven't tried solar reflective linings yet, but I gather they can help.

8.  Part of this approach is that I'm actively working to cool the bedrooms all during the daytime, long before I need them.  If you have upstairs and downstairs windows open at the same time, you get a 'chimney' effect, where the hot air flowing out of the bedroom window will suck up cooler air from below.

9.  As soon as the sun is sensibly low in the sky and it's actually getting bearable outside, open pretty much everything that you can and try to get air currents flowing through the bedroom before you go to bed.

10.  When you want go to bed, leave open everything that you are able to leave open, (I'm lucky in that I have one downstairs window that would be very hard for a burglar to reach -if you don't have this advantage, consider fitting wire mesh or bars across a window that you would like to leave open. Upstairs/downstairs air flow can make a real difference, wedge the connecting doors open to allow the air to flow.

I went to bed later than normal, partly so that I could leave the back door open as long as possible.

when I finally went to bed, the temperature was bearable and stayed so all night.

However, if it gets much hotter than this....
watervole: (Default)
 Aviation starkly demonstrates the difference between rich and poor. Taking a long-haul flight generates more carbon emissions than the average person in dozens of countries produces in a whole year.

Even a short-haul flight - say London to Edinburgh - will emit more CO2 than the average person in Uganda or Somalia does in a year.

But, it's the poor who will suffer the most from the resulting environmental damage.


watervole: (Default)
I get my electricity from Ecotricity.  Here's why -

Most renewable electricity in the UK comes about because the big electricity companies are required by the government to produce a certain % of renewable energy.  This % is currently greater than the number of their customers on green tariffs.  Therefore, if you get renewable electricity from one of these companies, they don't have to create any new wind/solar farms.  In short, your 'green' tariff produces no net environmental gain.

With Ecotricity, it's different.  They use their profits to create more renewable energy, so you're actually making a difference.  Plus, because I joined via the RSPB, they make a donation every year to the RSPB on my behalf.


watervole: (Default)
 Something positive you can do while we're still in the EU.  (or if you're German or Czech, while you remain in the EC)

The aviation tax exemption has bugged me, ever since I discovered the madness of it existing at all.

Carbon emissions from aviation are increasing every year, but aviation fuel is EXEMPT from tax. It's an agreement going way back when, and it needs to end.  You pay on petrol for your car, but aircraft pay nothing.  Go figure...
 

This EU Citizens Initiative asks to end the aviation fuel tax exemption in Europe, and needs 1 million signatures to be successful. Please sign the initiative here

 
ECI.EC.EUROPA.EU
 
watervole: (Default)
 Why not visit https://footprint.wwf.org.uk and find out what your environmental footprint is?

It takes a broad look at energy, food, your home, stuff you buy, travel, etc.  It's an easy one to fill in, as it doesn't ask for exact numbers for anything.

I found that I'm at 78% of the UK target carbon target for 2020, which is good in one way, and a bit scary in another.

It means that I'm well below the UK average, but that I probably still need to find further savings to get to the level we need to be at by 2030.

I experimentally added a return flight to the east coast of the USA, and, as I expected, it pushed me over budget, bringing me to 108%.

It is virtually impossible to fly overseas and stay within your carbon budget.

According to the calculator, even the relatively small amount of driving I do, is still a major factor in my overall footprint (more than I'd expected), but we do have a fairly large car, so that is probably a factor.

I tried a retake eliminating all car use and that came out as 64% (which is getting close to the world average)

I need to think of ways of reducing my car usage.  I'm definitely getting an electric bike (though it will have to wait until I recover from  a badly sprained ankle).  The only drawback is that any new product carries a big carbon footprint all of its own.
watervole: (Default)
 We have a decade in which to halve our carbon emissions - or see our children's future destroyed. There are many things we can do towards this goal, but one of the simplest and most effective is to cut down on aviation.

Just one return flight from London to New York produces a greater carbon footprint than a whole year's personal allowance needed to keep the climate safe.

There are currently no green alternatives to aviation fuel. Biofuels come from palm oil, and are a big cause of tropical deforestation.

If you think you can go through 2020 without flying, sign the pledge here - https://www.flightfree.co.uk/pledge

Easy for me - I've already signed.  I realised the carbon cost of flying much earlier than most  (I did my degree in Environmental Sciences) and gave up flying back in 2002.

One international flight blows your carbon budget out of the water - it's as simple as that.
 

watervole: (Default)
I was just chatting to my dad, who likes to do a cruise holiday every couple of years, and we were discussing the environmental impact.

I thought there was a fair environmental cost to cruises, but we were both surprised by what I found when I looked it up.

Cruises are far, far worse than flying.  If you take a liner to your destination, your carbon emissions will be nearly double that of a similar flight (and the impact of that flight is bad enough that I've given up flying), and there is also a massive impact of sulphur emissions, sewage, oil contaminated water, rubbish, etc.

Add in the fact that many people fly to their starting destination, and cruises are an environmental disaster zone.
watervole: (Default)
We had a really good Xmas this year - me, my husband, my daughter and her wife, and my son and his fiance, and our four-year old granddaughter.

We'd agreed as a family on an environmentally-friendly Xmas - which is pretty easy as most of our family already lean that way - second-hand books have been welcome gifts for many years (half the price, twice as many books - it's a no-brainer).

This year, we took it a step further.  The vast majority of gifts were either second-hand, donations to charity, environmentally friendly, hand-made, or board games (being made of cardboard, they have a very low environmental impact - which is fortunate given how much we play them...) 

Second hand lego, second hand lava lamp, hand made gifts - my sister Gillian made a hat and scarf for Oswin with second hand yarn, and Oswin loved it.   Might have been the great purple colour, or maybe the knitted butterfly on the end!

I made a dice bag for my son's fiancee using only materials I already had and she was delighted with it - making it yourself means you can personalise to an amazing extent - find me a commercial dice bag with a brightly-coloured diplodocus and a degu on it!

All the wrapping paper was re-used stuff from last year (and much of it will be used again next year).  Where wrapping paper wasn't available, pillow cases make good wrappers for gifts. (second hand scarves also work well).

Once you get your head round the fact that you don't need to measure love/affection by the amount of money you spend, you will understand why no one spent a large sum on Oswin's gifts and yet, she was delighted with all of them.   A 'Saving Dory' scooter from a charity shop was seized with cries of delight, a cheap bow and arrow (bought on a market stall in the summer before I decided to go totally second hand) provided much fun for Oswin, and her mum, and her uncle!  Second hand children's books are ridiculously cheap, so she got several excellent ones.

I don't think any of her close family spent more than a tenner on her. Was she happy? Definitely!  (Her other grandmother appears to define her purpose in life as drowning Oswin in as many toys as possible, but when Oswin is playing at our house, she frequently chooses to use no toys at all, or to adapt random items to her purpose.   Last week, she re-enacted the school nativity play using majhong tile racks to form a stage, a large quantity of dice (we're gamers, we have LOTS of dice) as the children, and a group of clockwork dinosaurs as the parents.)

My son's fiancee is vegan, so we went for a vegan Xmas lunch which was enjoyed by all (apart from me as I was unwell, and simply not hungry).  We did have an option of a meat pate starter for those who didn't want to go totally vegan, but only a few opted for it.  The deserts were a mixture of vegan and veggie (ie. contained cream or cheese).  The sticky toffee pear pudding was gorgeous (I tried a bit on Boxing Day when I was up to nibbling stuff).

 You know how after Xmas you normally have this great big pile of rubbish?

We didn't.  There's some cardboard from delivery boxes for board games, but that's all recyclable.  That's when I realised just how much packaging new presents come in.
watervole: (Default)
We had a really good Xmas this year - me, my husband, my daughter and her wife, and my son and his fiance, and our four-year old granddaughter.




We'd agreed as a family on an environmentally-friendly Xmas - which is pretty easy as most of our family already lean that way - second-hand books have been welcome gifts for many years (half the price, twice as many books - it's a no-brainer).

This year, we took it a step further.  The vast majority of gifts were either second-hand, donations to charity, environmentally friendly, hand-made, or board games (being made of cardboard, they have a very low environmental impact - which is fortunate given how much we play them...) 

Second hand lego, second hand lava lamp, hand made gifts - my sister Gillian made a hat and scarf for Oswin with second hand yarn from a charity shop, and Oswin loved it.   Might have been the great purple colour, or maybe the knitted butterfly on the end!

I made a dice bag for my son's fiancee using only materials I already had and she was delighted with it - making it yourself means you can personalise to an amazing extent - find me a commercial dice bag with a brightly-coloured diplodocus and a degu on it!



Here's the degu - they're a kind of rodent.

and the diplodocus - I'm afraid photography is not one of my skills...



All the wrapping paper was re-used stuff from last year (and much of it will be used again next year).  Where wrapping paper wasn't available, pillow cases make good wrappers for gifts. (second hand scarves also work well).

Once you get your head round the fact that you don't need to measure love/affection by the amount of money you spend, you will understand why no one spent a large sum on Oswin's gifts and yet, she was delighted with all of them.   A 'Saving Dory' scooter from a charity shop was seized with cries of delight, a cheap bow and arrow (bought on a market stall in the summer before I decided to go totally second hand) provided much fun for Oswin, and her mum, and her uncle!  Second hand children's books are ridiculously cheap, so she got several excellent ones.

I don't think any of her close family spent more than a tenner on her. Was she happy? Definitely! 

Her other grandmother appears to define her purpose in life as drowning Oswin in as many toys as possible, but when Oswin is playing at our house, she frequently chooses to use no toys at all, or to adapt random items to her purpose.   Last week, she re-enacted the school nativity play using majhong tile racks to form a stage, a large quantity of dice (we're gamers, we have LOTS of dice) as the children, and a group of clockwork dinosaurs as the parents.  Today, she spent a happy hour or so with a small tub of PlayDoh her uncle gave her last Xmas - the first thing she made was a replica of the quiver that her bow and arrows came with (using the cylinder, that some cocktail sticks came in, as a mould to roll her slab round).

My son's fiancee is vegan, so we went for a vegan Xmas lunch which was enjoyed by all (apart from me as I was unwell, and simply not hungry).  We did have an option of a meat pate starter for those who didn't want to go totally vegan, but only a few opted for it.  The deserts were a mixture of vegan and veggie (ie. contained cream or cheese).  The sticky toffee pear pudding was gorgeous (I tried a bit on Boxing Day when I was up to nibbling stuff).

 You know how after Xmas you normally have this great big pile of rubbish?

We didn't.  There's some cardboard from delivery boxes for board games, but that's all recyclable.  That's when I realised just how much packaging new presents come in.

We had a really enjoyable day, with a fraction of the environmental footprint that generally goes with Xmas.  It doesn't have to cost the Earth, either financially or literally.
watervole: (Default)
 We have to cut our carbon emissions by 45% in the next twelve years to avoid catastrophic (and probably irreversible) climate change.

This isn't some dim, distant future: it's happening now.  This is my lifetime, my children's lifetime, and all of my granddaughter's lifetime.

It's hard for many people to know what they can do to make a difference, so I'm going to try posting regularly on the subject. (I find it difficult to post much about climate change because so many people are in denial, and even people who understand the problem still tend to say "But I can't give up 'x', and the rest just move onto the next post because it's less stressful to read about cats....  But we have to take action, or we lose everything.)

It's hard to visualise what the effects of climate change are. We're already seeing the droughts,storms,  floods and fires, but there is far more to it than that. eg. by 2050, the area where coffee is grown is expected to halve, as the climate becomes unsuitable for growing coffee.

So, what can you do?  Because there are things you can do, and you CAN make a difference.

The big issues are:

Heat
Travel
Meat


Let's look at meat.  Beef and lamb are the biggies here. Cows and sheep both fart methane, which is a very powerful greenhouse gas.  The ideal solution is to go vegetarian, but you don't have to do that to make a significant difference.  We don't eat meat more than once a day, and there are usually several days a week in which we don't have any meat at all.  My son's fiancee is vegan, and that's given us a real motivation to find interesting meals that contain no meat or dairy at all.  

I've made the decision to cut out beef and lamb entirely and only eat pork, venison and poultry from now on.  Venison where I live comes from non-native sika deer that over-graze the vegetation in nature reserves and have to be shot for pest control (as they have no natural predators).  That's definitely environmentally friendly meat!  

In a nutshell, cut out beef and lamb. Eat pork and poultry, and if you're an Aussie, eat rabbit and kangaroo.
watervole: (Default)
 We have twelve years in which to reduce our carbon emissions by 45% or face catastrophic climate change.

It's not a topic people are comfortable talking about, because it requires us all to make difficult choices about our lifestyles, but it's a topic that we have to raise for our own sakes, let alone the sake of our children and grandchildren.

This is not some far distant future.

Drought in the UK this summer had a massive impact on crop yields (our allotment produced half what it normally does - and we watered as much as we could).

Fire in the USA had devastating results.

Floods last winter caused massive damage.

The Great Barrier Reef is dying from heat stress, much of it is dead already. If we can keep the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees, then we will only (and I stress the word 'only') lose 90% of the world's coral reefs.  If the temperature rises by 2 degrees, then we lose ALL the coral reefs.


We're past the point where recycling your rubbish will make a global impact. (It's useful and virtuous, but it can easily be mistaken for making a serious impact on the problem)

The big carbon issues are :Travel, Heat, Meat.

Cut out aviation and you will have made the single biggest change that you can make.  The last time I flew to the USA was shortly after 9/11.  I was damned if terrorists were going to stop me visiting my American friends.  What terrorists could not achieve, environmental issues did.  The next year, I did a carbon footprint calculation - I have never flown since I did that calculation.  The cost was simply too high.

My annual carbon emissions are around 3 tons.  One return transatlantic flight would add another ton to that.
watervole: (Default)
I've just changed my bank.

I've moved from First Direct, who have a lot of fossil fuel investments, to Nationwide, who have none at all.
So far, the changeover process has been very easy.

I don't want my money to enable new oil wells to be dug or new coal mines to start up.

I'll miss First Direct's excellent telephone banking, but Nationwide have two branches within walking distance, so I still have human beings within easy reach. And internet banking, of course. And their savings account pays a good rate of interest (for a bank savings account).

Many ways of reducing carbon emissions are difficult, but changing bank is within everyone's grasp.

Having the cutest four-year-old in the world as a granddaughter, I'm acutely aware of the future that our society is going to leave her. Winter floods and summer droughts. Temperatures that ruin crops and kill the elderly. Any small step (especially one that doesn't cost me a penny) is worth doing to help her world.

Once the changeover is complete, if it all goes smoothly, then I'll be waving the "refer a friend" option at people in the UK. It gives you and me both £100 if you change your account to Nationwide. I'll donate my £100 to charity if anyone takes up the offer.
watervole: (Default)
 I've only changed bank twice in my life, once when I got married and once when Barclays made a major screw up and took several months to admit it was their fault and to fix it.

It looks like I'm about to do it again.  I'm about to leave an excellent bank with great customer service who have never given me any hassle at all.

Why?

I've just become a subscriber to Ethical Consumer - the main reason I subscribed was to look at where I wanted to invest my money and to ensure that I wasn't investing in fossil fuels or heavily polluting industries.

Sadly, it turns out that First Direct (and their parent bank HSBC) both have  a very bad track record in fossil fuel investments - and also in companies producing nuclear weapons).

I'm going to pay a visit to Nationwide very soon.    They came out very close to the top on the issues that matter most to me (climate change) and they are based in the UK. 

I expect to be moving my account to them.

Then I'll move onto sorting out my savings.

To put it bluntly, no point in saving money for my grandchild if there isn't a habitable planet for her to enjoy it. Therefore, I'm willing to have less interest for better ethics (and some investments may offer both).
watervole: (Default)
We only have one planet and it's in trouble.

Sadly, this is the point where a fair percentage of readers will skip ahead to the next journal.  Everyone knows it's a problem.  Some simply can't deal with it as they're too stressed out already, some feel they can't make a difference and some aren't willing to change their lifestyle even though it would make a difference.

So, let's try some tiny changes which might be within people's grasp. 

We need to reduce our use of plastics and reduce our consumption of food.  If we can benefit in other ways at the same time, then that is a plus. 

Social pressure is one of the biggest drivers of what we do and when it comes to social pressure, it's hard for anyone to make the first move.

My husband decided to lose weight last year.  He managed a slow steady loss and ended up several stone lighter and has kept that new weight.  He didn't go on a diet, he just changed a few habits.

One habit was biscuits.  He stopped eating biscuits.

To make that easier, we stopped putting biscuits on the table when we invited our gaming friends round. (If they asked, biscuits were still available, but they rarely did so.)  

What was really interesting was that after a couple of months, our gaming friends (who were also trying to lose weight) stopped putting biscuits out when we visited.

Social pressure had let all of us to put biscuits out, as there is the fear of appearing mean if you don't.  As it turned out, we were all perfectly happy without them, but it had needed someone to make that first move.

So, a tiny change, but less plastic wrappers, less food consumed, less fuel to move it around, and a beneficial aid to losing weight.
watervole: (Default)
 British Columbia is a rare example of a region with a carbon tax.

They make it popular by sharing out the revenue from the tax as a  reduction in other taxes.

It appears to be working.  CO2 emissions have fallen, both directly and relative to the rest of Canada.

Their economy is also doing fine relative to the rest of Canada, in fact, slightly ahead.

The only fact I can't find data on is whether they are shifting pollution elsewhere (by importing stuff that involves producing a lot of CO2 rather than making it at home).  

Sadly, it excludes aviation.

BAsically, I think it's an idea definitely worth trying elsewhere.  A group of Republican senators tried, but I don't think they've had any success.  However, I do find it reassuring that there are Republicans who are concerned about climate change.

Climate change should not be a party issue - it affects everyone.

watervole: (Default)
 Forget Brexit and the current economy.  Look further ahead.  

The planet is currently projected to be 3-4 degrees warmer by the end of the century.  Some recently estimates put it as high as 7C over pre-industrial levels by then (new positive feedback loops)

I've just been comparing manifestos.

(Don't take my word for it, look here - https://www.carbonbrief.org/election-2017-what-minfestos-say-energy-climate-change )

In essence, the Conservatives want to get every last bit of oil out of the North sea, frack for shale gas, expand airports (while claiming to lead the world in fighting climate change...)  Note that our emissions have only fallen in recent years because we effectively export our carbon emissions by importing carbon-intensive products. When imports are added in, our emissions are still rising.  They won't allow any onshore wind power, apart from on Scottish islands.  No mention of carbon capture and storage.

Labour - ban fracking, want to have a lot more renewables, mention CCS, want to work onzsero-carbon heating for houses, but they still want to use North Sea oil and expand airports.

Lib Dems - want Cabinet position for Sustainability and have specific legislation intentions for green stuff.  Would reduce energy bills by improving insulation rather than capping prices. No fracking, restore subsidies for renewables.  Support CCS and want zero-carbon new homes.  Help establish new industries in areas where oil is a major employer.  Will not increase net number of runways in UK (I sense some weasel wording there)

Greens - what you'd expect.   But most of us won't have a Green candidate with a decent chance.

Basically, if you want your children and grandchildren to have a world that is not  headed like an express train for environmental collapse, your best bet is to vote Lib Dem.  If you don't have a decent Lib Dem candidate, vote Labour.

We live in one of the richest countries in the world.  If we don't make serious attempts to slash carbon emissions, then how can we ask anyone else to?

There are some Conservative policies I support, but I have a granddaughter.  She will live in the world that we are a creating.  It's going to be hot - our only hope is to try and keep it to just 2C rise -1.5C is already a lost cause.




watervole: (Default)
Thanks to Ranunculus for telling me about this.

(apologies for the random font and size changes.  It happens when I cut and paste bits and I can't work out how to make it all the same)

Carbon farming looks like a really interesting set of techniques.

in a nutshell - Carbon Farming involves implementing practices that are known to improve the rate at which CO2 is removed from the atmosphere and converted to plant material and/or soil organic matter.

One of the basic techniques is to spread compost on low-fertility rangeland. the compost encourages grass growth, the grass increases the amount of organic matter in the soil, which takes carbon from the atmosphere and adds it to the soil.
With more organic matter, the moisture holding capacity of the soil increases, and this encourages more plants to grows, etc.

There are lots more techniques - 'no dig' is very important as ploughing causes a lot of carbon to be lost from the soil. Seed drills are part of the solution.  Other things include techniques to reduce erosion, so planting wind breaks, encouraging vegetation on river banks, wetland restoration, etc.  

If you live in the USA
 and want to donate to the Carbon Project (which is actively researching these techniques), then donations are (currently) exempt from Federal tax.  (In other word, if you want to help some genuine science which has the potential to lock up carbon and improve soil quality at the same time, do it quickly before the president decides to try and stop it)

I just tried to send them some money, but I'm having problems with Avast Passwords and I'm not recovered well enough from the asthama to have the mental energy to struggle finding my Paypal password.  (I can remember my Avast master password, but  Avast is causing other screw ups...)

There's also a partner project called Fibreshed that aims to produce carbon neutral yarn.

Fascinating stuff all round and a rare glimmer of hope on the environmental front.
watervole: (Default)
News has many impacts, but very few things cause us to take action, and when we do act it is usually in very easy ways.

We're all familiar with the responses that can be heaped upon people in arenas like Facebook when a racist or homophobic remark can result in a comment going viral and hundreds or thousands of people sending hate-filled responses to the original poster.

It's easy.  It allows the commenter to feel they've done something, but it costs them nothing beyond a few seconds of typing.

(I often wonder if this is why some right-wing religious groups target gay men.  It requires no sacrifice on their part, but makes them feel they are exerting effort to fulfill god's wishes.  Other Biblical requirements are much harder to meet.  Not killing, not stealing, giving lots of money to the poor, get progressively harder.)

It's like that with environmental issues.  The Daily Mail can heap praise upon itself for the success of a campaign to put a charge on one-use carrier bags.  It's easy.  The worst thing it can do to us is to make us pay 5p for a carrier bag, or to bring our own bag to the shop.  It's an easy feel good factor to own a re-usable shopping bag.  

Most people will move up to sorting and putting out their recyclable rubbish. It's easy, and there's an awareness that it helps keep council tax down (because of landfill charges).

After that, sadly, we're mostly driven by the desire to look good.  It's no coincidence that most people installed double glazing long before they added decent loft insulation (even though loft insulation is far, far, more cost-effective).  Loft insulation is invisible and double glazing makes our houses look good.  We tell ourselves we're installing it for environmental reasons, but if it didn't come with good looking PVC frames, it wouldn't have caught on nearly as well.

Climate change is something we want the government to act upon.  They should definitely do something.  Though we're not always too sure about what.  We want green electricity, and it sounds great, but we also don't want anything that will lower our standard of living.

and thereby lies the crunch.  We ignore (not even deliberately, but by glossing over or turning the page) things that are stressful or that demand big changes from us.

If everyone on the planet lived as we do in the UK, we would need three planets to support everyone.  In other words, we're using resources three times faster than is sustainable.

And here's the even harder part.  Although we have known this for decades, and awareness of environmental issues is rising, our environmental footprint over that period has risen rather than fallen.

In short, we're destroying the natural environment (and the life support system for our children and grandchildren) because we're unwilling to sacrifice lifestyle elements that are often luxuries rather than essentials.

It's a New Year.  

What are you prepared to give up that will actually make a difference?

 



watervole: (Default)
 Arctic sea is melting at a rate never seen before.  That's  having all kinds of knock-on effects, including the release of methane from the sea floor (a worse gas than CO2 for climate change)

It's a vicious circle.   The methane released by the warmer temperatures helps warm the atmosphere further.  And that isn't the only knock on effect...

And at the same time, the UK government are trying to make us believe that adding a third runway at Heathrow will not prevent us from meeting our promises on Climate Change - a claim that is pretty impossible to believe.

Air travel is one of the largest sources of CO2 emissions that we have any personal control over.  We have to eat. We have to get to work.  We really don't want to freeze in the winter. But we don't have to go on foreign holidays.  

Try any carbon footprint calculator of your choice - they will all tell you the same thing.  Giving up air travel will make a big difference, bigger than any other lifestyle change you can make.

If you have a beloved child, nephew, neice or grandchild, this may be the single best gift you can ever give them.  Try and give them a world that still resembles the one you love now, before we pass the point of no return.

For the sake of my children and everyone's children, I gave up air travel in 2002.

For my granddaughter, and everyone else's grandchildren, I intend to keep that pledge for the rest of my life.

Profile

watervole: (Default)
Judith Proctor

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 01:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios