watervole: (Up to no good)
Judith Proctor ([personal profile] watervole) wrote2010-10-16 06:17 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

Photo hosting

I've just been trying out the 'macro' facility on my shiny new camera.  This enables even a klutz like me to take good close up photos.  I can see that I will have the urge to put photos on the web.

Thus, a question - what is the best place for me to keep my photos?

Things that matter to me are that it's free, that it has good tagging facilities and is easy to use.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
ext_15862: (Default)

[identity profile] watervole.livejournal.com 2010-10-16 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Why? What are the drawbacks of Flickr?

[identity profile] linda-joyce.livejournal.com 2010-10-16 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
None that I can specify I just don't like the feel of it. Probably because I was very used to Photobucket before I tried fliker. It's probably easier to say what I like about PB I like the way you can create 'albums' in Photobucket and can continue to down load any photo directly into them if you consider it suitable, and it has plenty of space for tags though I don't use them. It's great for bulk uploading and has a better editing suit than I have on my computer. Perhaps if some one does reply with their reasons why flicker is best you can compare them.
ext_15862: (Default)

[identity profile] watervole.livejournal.com 2010-10-16 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
YOu're right - it is easy to edit pictures!
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only