I think there's more care these days, but I'm not a purist (though some are). As long as there is far less meat, I'm pretty happy.
You're undoubtedly right about chemical synthesis, but it still kicks in way below the footprint of meat. Meat's a massive driver of deforestation (for soya or grain to go in cattle feed) and also has a serious problem from methane emissions - farts!
Re: I'd be wary:
You're undoubtedly right about chemical synthesis, but it still kicks in way below the footprint of meat. Meat's a massive driver of deforestation (for soya or grain to go in cattle feed) and also has a serious problem from methane emissions - farts!
Good to see you commenting :)