Beetroot, Orange and Walnut Salad
My husband has always been a good cook - his mother taught him, and she had a real knack for tasty meals that didn't take forever to make or need exotic ingredients. (She was a domestic science teacher for part of her life - I suspect her pupils were very lucky students)
This last year, he's been focusing on vegan recipes, and some of them are absolutely delicious.
Here's one of my favourites. It should be eaten as a main meal. The quantities aren't included, because they don't need to be exact, and you can tweak as you like.
It also has the added bonus of looking very pretty on the plate, with the dark purple beetroot and the orange segments, with the walnuts scattered around.
Beetroot, Orange and Walnut Salad
no subject
no subject
no subject
Wine vinegar?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But then some are good for minerals, etc.
no subject
Maybe I got the proportions wrong.
no subject
Maybe it was the beetroot/balsamic vinegar part?
no subject
I might try one more recipe, which is a squash risotto with toasted walnuts; toasting them should intensify the flavour.
no subject
They're probably my least favourite nut, but there are some things I like them in.
I'll be interested to hear how roasting them works.
no subject
Toasted walnuts are nice, though. Apparently the Americans sugar-glaze them ('candied walnuts') before adding them to risotto, but then Americans seem to use bizarrely large quantities of sugar in everything.
Facebook has been showing me American dessert recipes, and when you convert the quantities from the relatively small-sounding 'cups', because sugar is so heavy relative to its volume you realise you're being asked to make a pie filling with something like eight ounces of sugar in it... "Chocolate cobbler" sounded appealing, until I looked at the quantities and realised it wasn't just 5oz sugar in the main mixture, but another 7oz sugar in the topping -- a couple of weeks' worth of sugar in a single dessert! And even "Water pie", supposedly a super-economical recipe from the Great Depression, involves 5 tablespoons of butter and 7oz sugar in addition to all the ingredients required for a large pie-crust -- a very big change from the English economy recipes I've been baking that rely on beetroot to save on sugar and potatoes to save on fat and flour. The chocolate pudding from a few days ago had one ounce of fat and one and a half ounces of sugar to eight ounces of grated vegetables and six ounces of flour... and was still very moist and tasty after being steamed for a couple of hours. I'm pretty sure I've got a 'self-saucing' pudding in the National Trust cookbook that is similar to the 'cobbler', because I remember accidentally putting twice too much water in it and still getting successful results -- and I'm pretty sure the proportions are nothing like the US ones!
no subject
Sugar... Apart from making jam, we hardly use any at all.
What some people use is absolutely crazy! No wonder diabetes is so widespead.
'Cobbler'to us means a slightly dry dumpling mix spread used on top of a casserole a bit like a very thick pie crust.
no subject
I did wonder if traditional American cuisine might explain the traditional American waistline, but then to be fair the diet of the English working class at that same era consisted of a high proportion of bread-and-jam -- nobody got fat on it, even if they mostly lost teeth. More a matter of modern physical inactivity, I think.
I put the last of the walnuts into some orange nut teabread
I've always known a 'cobbler' as a series of overlapping scone rounds used in lieu of a pastry topping, which I think is effectively the same thing.
Perhaps I should make a butternut squash cobbler out of the other half of my squash, which has developed a squishy spot where the rock-hard skin has evidently been damaged at some point...