watervole: (Default)
Judith Proctor ([personal profile] watervole) wrote2008-10-07 08:53 am
Entry tags:

The Last Unicorn - review

This is a book that I read after seeing it in the librarys of several of my friends on Library Thing (It was the only book that Kerravonsen had actually given a rating to, and she gave it 5  stars).  I was curious.

It's a fantasy novel, which reminds me of the 'Princess Bride' more than anything else.  The narrative exists on several levels.  The characters have a self-awareness that they live in a reality of fairy stories.  Prince Lir slays dragons and presents their heads to his lady love, because that's what heros do.  Cully, the outlaw, desperately hopes that his visitor is Professor Child, the (historically real) collector of ballads, as he wants all the songs that he has written about himself to be recorded for posterity.  The songs, are, of course, largely cobbled together from existing folk songs about famous outlaws and bandits - Cully has no skill as a songwriter any more than he has as an outlaw.

However, the reason the novel works is because there is a second layer of awareness underlying the first.  There is magic that is flummery (even though it is still what we would call magic) and magic that is real.  The magic that doesn't count is simple conjuring.  It may achieve things that we would regard as impossible to be done by sleight of hand, but it achieves nothing that really matters.  It can create the seeming of a manticore from a lion, but it cannot make the lion actually BE a manticore.  Sometimes, it verges on the edge of reality.  When the spider weaving the web believes that she really is Archne, then her belief adds to the illusion cast upon her.

The second kind of magic is deeper and more real and harder to define.  It isn't just tricks and appearances.  It is the unicorn.  She is more real than anything around her.  She does not consciously set out to influence the world around her; her intererst in mortals is pretty much non-existant.  She is incapable of love.  Love is transient, fleeting, mortal. She is immortal and unchanging.

In a world where unicorns can exist, there is always the possibility of real magic.  The outlaws play at being Robin Hood and try and adapt his legends to themselves, but the real Robin is the ultimate dream for them.  To see or touch the real Robin Hood is to bring reality to their dreams and hopes for themselves.  Not the cold reality that destroys dreams, but the kind of reality that says dreams have meaning and are but the shadow of an eternal verity.

The unicorn is an abstract. She is pure beauty, moonlight in darkness.  She is springtime.  To once see a unicorn is to carry something of beauty with you for the rest of your life.  She is hope.  She is pure and untouchable. She is the sure knowledge that there is something unsullied in the world.

She is the last of her kind.

When she sets forth from her eternal springtime forest to seek other unicorns, then she sets the story in motion.  (I'm not going to talk about the people she meets, as I don't believe in giving away plots in advance.)

The novel has both strengths and weaknesses.  The greatest strength is the sense of beauty and m.agic behind the veil of myth and fairy tale.

The weakness (for me at least) is when the parody is slightly over-done.  The anachronisms are probably deliberate to make the contrasts sharper, but I still find medieval outlaws eating tacos to be a little disconcerting.

The other great strength lies in Beagle's descriptive writing. He has a real gift for phrases that come to life: "following the fleeing darkness into a wind that tasted like nails".  I can feel and taste the entire rainstorm in that single phrase.

Peter S Beagle will be a guest at Aetherica

[identity profile] tictactoepony.livejournal.com 2008-10-07 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
There's also an 80s animated version - very pretty, strange haunting music.

[identity profile] sallymn.livejournal.com 2008-10-07 09:08 am (UTC)(link)
{puts on one's to-get-hold-of list...}

:)
kerravonsen: cover of "The Blue Sword": Fantasy (Fantasy)

[personal profile] kerravonsen 2008-10-07 09:39 am (UTC)(link)
I'm glad you liked it. 8-)

(Though I'm puzzled as to why you say it's the only book I've given a rating to, since that wasn't the case even at the point when you complained about my lack of rating things...)
ext_15862: (Default)

[identity profile] watervole.livejournal.com 2008-10-07 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
I must admit that I only remember you having the one book rated, but I could easily be wrong. The stranger thing is that I remember you as having given it five stars, but looking again, I see only three.
kerravonsen: cover of "The Blue Sword": Fantasy (Fantasy)

[personal profile] kerravonsen 2008-10-08 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I think I gave it three because it's been far too long since I've read it, so I was uncertain of what rating it should get. I keep on meaning to read it again.
ext_15862: (Default)

[identity profile] watervole.livejournal.com 2008-10-08 09:49 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not rating stuff unless I've read it pretty recently or remember it really well - I find it's giving me an incentive to re-read a lot of stuff.

[identity profile] cu-sith.livejournal.com 2008-10-07 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You've reminded me that I really need to give this a re-read. And watch the film again - it's been years.

[identity profile] meltinthemist.livejournal.com 2008-10-07 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh, I never knew that it was a book. I grew up watching the movie since I was 4 or so though.