I hate Coriolis Force
When a perfectly self-respecting wind blows north, it gets deflected eastwards (it's all due to the Earth's rotation and the fact that the area it is coming from is rotating faster than the area it is going to).
Thus, winds in the northern hemisphere blow clockwise round areas of high pressure and anti-clockwise around areas of low pressure.
Now, an area of low pressure is cyclonic and an area of high pressure is referred to as an anti-cyclone.
In nothern hemisphere, the wind blows clockwise round anti-cyclones and in the southern hemisphere, the wind blows anti-clockwise round anti-cyclones (because Coriolis force is operating in the other direction).
Is your brain hurting yet? (It's all the different 'antis' that do it to me.)
And I confess to not understanding at all why winds in the northern hemisphere that are blowing west-east are still deflected to the right. (I think I understood this once about 26 years ago when I struggled with it for a day or two with a friend, but the short OU course I'm doing now is too basic to cover that particular bit and in any case I'm not sure if I could cope with the explanation or not.)
Anyone think they can explain it?
Thus, winds in the northern hemisphere blow clockwise round areas of high pressure and anti-clockwise around areas of low pressure.
Now, an area of low pressure is cyclonic and an area of high pressure is referred to as an anti-cyclone.
In nothern hemisphere, the wind blows clockwise round anti-cyclones and in the southern hemisphere, the wind blows anti-clockwise round anti-cyclones (because Coriolis force is operating in the other direction).
Is your brain hurting yet? (It's all the different 'antis' that do it to me.)
And I confess to not understanding at all why winds in the northern hemisphere that are blowing west-east are still deflected to the right. (I think I understood this once about 26 years ago when I struggled with it for a day or two with a friend, but the short OU course I'm doing now is too basic to cover that particular bit and in any case I'm not sure if I could cope with the explanation or not.)
Anyone think they can explain it?

Piffle
It's all because of the trees waving their branches about. So says Belgarath in the Belgariad.
(in Magician's Gambit, if I remember correctly, in his tower in the Vale, right at the point when he switches from being Mister Wolf to being Belgarath, which I always thought was a fantastic piece of subliminally indicating the viewpoint character's change of perspective.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But the two-dimensional mapping of this onto the earth's surface varies with latitude (because being perpendicular the the earth's axis is not the same as a line from the surface to the centre). At the equator, there is no horizontal component of this at all. The farther north you go, the more the perpendicular-to-the-earth's axis atrts to look like the horizontal.
It's all an artifact of the problem of "horizontal" not relly being in a straight line, because we are all rotating...
The WikiPedia article is helpful.
no subject
I've found another article which does explain it in a fair amount of detail without getting heavily into vector mathematics though: Getting Around the Coriolis Force (http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~dvandom/Edu/newcor.html) from Ohio State University.
Here's my new explanation: an object moving faster than the rotation of the Earth (ie Westerly) wants to move straight "up" (away from the axis), but it can't because it's restrained by gravity, so it does the next best thing and moves toward the equator, which is further from the axis of rotation. An object moving slower than the rotation of the Earth (ie. Easterly) tries to move "down" (toward the axis), but it can't because it's restrained by the ground, so it does the next best thing and moves toward the nearest pole. One way to understand why the air wants to move "up" or "down" (relative to the axis of rotation) if you speed it up or slow it down relative to the Earth's rotation, is to think of air particles as being like trillions of orbiting satellites, except the thing holding them up against gravity is air pressure rather than centripetal force. If you increase the orbital velocity of a satellite, it climbs into a higher orbit, and if you decrease its velocity, it falls into a lower one.
no subject
I must admit, I was thinking of satellite orbits when I was originally puzzling with this, but couldn't find a mechanism to work between the two.
no subject
However, what about the E-W wind? That's deflected northwards.
I've been thinking about it
[I was struggling before because the way we explain the rightward deflection of the wind when blowing north or south completely breaks down if you try to use it to explain the rightward deflection of the wind blowing east or west—it turns out that's because it's a bad way of explaining it]
Now I just need to be in the same room as the person I'm explaining it to, with a pencil and some scrap paper :-)
Re: I've been thinking about it